in the Interest of R.H., A.D, and E.D., Children
This text of in the Interest of R.H., A.D, and E.D., Children (in the Interest of R.H., A.D, and E.D., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISSENTING OPINION
No. 04-01-00493-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF R.H., et al., Children
From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2000-PA-00420
Honorable David Berchelmann, Jr., Judge Presiding (1)
Opinion by: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Dissenting opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 13, 2002
I must respectfully dissent because I do not believe that the Craddock rule applies. This was not, in my opinion, a post-answer "default" because the appellant's counsel appeared and participated at the trial. Accordingly, I would conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellant's motion for new trial.
PUBLISH
1. The Honorable Peter Sakai presided over the hearing, and his recommendations were adopted by the Honorable David Berchelmann, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of R.H., A.D, and E.D., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-rh-ad-and-ed-children-texapp-2002.