In the Interest of Resean L.
This text of In the Interest of Resean L. (In the Interest of Resean L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
In the Interest of Resean L., A Juvenile under the Age of Seventeen (17), Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2011-197267
Appeal From Richland County W. Thomas Sprott, Jr., Family Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2013-MO-014 Heard March 20, 2013 – Filed April 24, 2013
REVERSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., Daniel Edward Johnson, and all of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Reversed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Arnold, 361 S.C. 386, 605 S.E.2d 529 (2004) (directed verdict standard); In re Walter M., 386 S.C. 387, 688 S.E.2d 133 (Ct. App. 2009) (directed verdict standard in juvenile proceedings).
REVERSED.
TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of Resean L., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-resean-l-sc-2013.