in the Interest of R.A.T., a Child
This text of in the Interest of R.A.T., a Child (in the Interest of R.A.T., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-21-00052-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF R.A.T., A CHILD
From the 82nd District Court Robertson County, Texas Trial Court No. 17-12-20419-CV
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant’s motion to withdraw his appeal of the trial court’s Default Order in
Suit for Modification of Support Order and to Confirm Support Arrearage was filed on
March 22, 2021. In the motion, appellant asked this Court to withdraw his appeal without
charging him the filing fee because appellant alleged he was not aware he was required
to pay a filing fee and could not afford to pay the filing fee.
By letter dated March 26, 2021, the Clerk of this Court informed appellant that the
payment of the filing fee is required, unless appellant obtained indigent status for
purposes of appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1. The Clerk enclosed a
form Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs with the letter and
explained to appellant that if he wished to proceed with the appeal without the payment of cost, appellant must fill out the form and return it to the Court within 21 days from the
date of the letter. Appellant was also informed that this Court would delay ruling on the
motion to withdraw until the time to file the Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of
Court Costs had passed. However, appellant was warned in the same letter that if a
Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or the filing fee was not received
within 21 days from the date of the letter, the Court would proceed to a ruling on the
motion to withdraw. More than 21 days have passed and no Statement of Inability to
Afford Payment of Court Costs has been filed and no payment of the filing fee has been
received.
Accordingly, appellant’s “Motion to Withdraw Appeal” is granted, and this
appeal is dismissed.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Neill, and Justice Johnson Motion granted; appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed April 28, 2021 [CVO6]
In the Interest of R.A.T. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of R.A.T., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-rat-a-child-texapp-2021.