in the Interest of R.A.K.M.,aka, R.M., A.D.R.H., R.D.H., R.D.S., and R.A.S

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 1, 2009
Docket14-09-00480-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of R.A.K.M.,aka, R.M., A.D.R.H., R.D.H., R.D.S., and R.A.S (in the Interest of R.A.K.M.,aka, R.M., A.D.R.H., R.D.H., R.D.S., and R.A.S) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of R.A.K.M.,aka, R.M., A.D.R.H., R.D.H., R.D.S., and R.A.S, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 1, 2009.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-09-00480-CV

In the Interest of R.A.K.M, A/K/A R.M., A.D.R.H., R.D.H., R.D.S.,

AND R.A.S.

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

 Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2007-10012J

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed April 16, 2009.  No clerk=s record has been filed.  The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 


On August 6, 2009, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court's intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

No response has been received.  Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Guzman, and Boyce.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of R.A.K.M.,aka, R.M., A.D.R.H., R.D.H., R.D.S., and R.A.S, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-rakmaka-rm-adrh-rdh-rds-and-ras-texapp-2009.