in the Interest of R.A.J., C.A.J., and G.G.J.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 14, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
Appellant, K.R.J., appeals from the trial court’s November 15, 2017 “Final
Order and Judgment in Suit to Modify Parent-Child Relationship.” Appellant’s brief
was originally due on January 7, 2019. Two extensions were granted extending the
deadline to March 25, 2019. On April 4, 2019, we issued a notice advising appellant
that unless the brief was filed within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal for want
of prosecution. Appellant neither timely filed a brief nor requested an extension. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (appellate court may dismiss for want of prosecution for
failure to file appellant’s brief).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Hightower.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of R.A.J., C.A.J., and G.G.J. (in the Interest of R.A.J., C.A.J., and G.G.J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.