in the Interest of R.A.J., C.A.J., and G.G.J.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 14, 2019·No. 01-18-00051-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 14, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Appellant, K.R.J., appeals from the trial court’s November 15, 2017 “Final

Order and Judgment in Suit to Modify Parent-Child Relationship.” Appellant’s brief

was originally due on January 7, 2019. Two extensions were granted extending the

deadline to March 25, 2019. On April 4, 2019, we issued a notice advising appellant

that unless the brief was filed within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal for want

of prosecution. Appellant neither timely filed a brief nor requested an extension. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (appellate court may dismiss for want of prosecution for

failure to file appellant’s brief).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Hightower.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of R.A.J., C.A.J., and G.G.J., (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in the Interest of R.A.J., C.A.J., and G.G.J. (in the Interest of R.A.J., C.A.J., and G.G.J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.