in the Interest of R. N. P. and E. A. P.

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of R. N. P. and E. A. P.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 2014·No. 03-12-00090-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 25, 2014

NO. 03-12-00090-CV

In the Interest of R. N. P. and E. A. P.

APPEAL FROM 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on January 11, 2012. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 25, 2014

NO. 03-12-00090-CV

In the Interest of R. N. P. and E. A. P.

APPEAL FROM 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on January 11, 2012. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

in the Interest of R. N. P. and E. A. P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

in the Interest of R. N. P. and E. A. P. (in the Interest of R. N. P. and E. A. P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.