in the Interest of R. M. B. and G. R. B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of R. M. B. and G. R. B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services

DecidedJuly 31, 2014

Docket01-14-00499-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of R. M. B. and G. R. B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services (in the Interest of R. M. B. and G. R. B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of R. M. B. and G. R. B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of R. M. B. and G. R. B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services

Appellate case number: 01-14-00499-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-02934J

Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County

This appeal involves the termination of the parent-child relationship. As such, this Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed so far as reasonably possible. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2, reprinted in TEX. GOV’T. CODE ANN., tit. 2, subtit. F app. (West Supp. 2012).

The clerk’s record was due in this case on July 1, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. On July 8, 2014, the Clerk of this Court provided notice to the Harris County District Clerk that the clerk’s record was late and provided the district clerk with a deadline of March July 18, 2014 for filing the clerk’s record, requesting an extension of time, or providing a reason why the district clerk was not obligated to file the clerk’s record. The Harris County District Clerk failed to respond to said notice.

Therefore, the district clerk is ORDERED to file the record within 10 days of the date of this order, or the district clerk may be ordered to appear and show cause as to why the record has not been filed. No extensions of time will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 31, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of R. M. B. and G. R. B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services

Appellate case number: 01-14-00499-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-02934J

Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County

This appeal involves the termination of the parent-child relationship. As such, this Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed so far as reasonably possible. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2, reprinted in TEX. GOV’T. CODE ANN., tit. 2, subtit. F app. (West Supp. 2012).

The clerk’s record was due in this case on July 1, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. On July 8, 2014, the Clerk of this Court provided notice to the Harris County District Clerk that the clerk’s record was late and provided the district clerk with a deadline of March July 18, 2014 for filing the clerk’s record, requesting an extension of time, or providing a reason why the district clerk was not obligated to file the clerk’s record. The Harris County District Clerk failed to respond to said notice.

Therefore, the district clerk is ORDERED to file the record within 10 days of the date of this order, or the district clerk may be ordered to appear and show cause as to why the record has not been filed. No extensions of time will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 31, 2014

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of R. M. B. and G. R. B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-r-m-b-and-g-r-b-v-department-of-texapp-2014.