in the Interest of P.Y.M., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of P.Y.M., a Child

DecidedApril 29, 2013

Docket04-13-00024-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of P.Y.M., a Child (in the Interest of P.Y.M., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of P.Y.M., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 29, 2013

No. 04-13-00024-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.Y.M., A CHILD,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-PA-00373 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of her right to file her own brief. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.); see also In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights).

If the appellant desires to file a pro se brief, she must do so within twenty days from the date of this order. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than ten days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

____________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of April, 2013.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 29, 2013

No. 04-13-00024-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.Y.M., A CHILD,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-PA-00373 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of her right to file her own brief. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.); see also In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights).

If the appellant desires to file a pro se brief, she must do so within twenty days from the date of this order. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than ten days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

____________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of April, 2013.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of P.Y.M., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-pym-a-child-texapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack