in the Interest of P.R.G a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of P.R.G a Child

DecidedApril 5, 2007

Docket14-06-01105-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of P.R.G a Child (in the Interest of P.R.G a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of P.R.G a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 5, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 5, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-01105-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.R.G., a Child

On Appeal from the 308th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-30425

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment terminating the parental rights of appellant, Yeyde Anton, signed December 6, 2006. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on December 8, 2006. The appellate filing fee was not paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 5; see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005). On January 4, 2007, appellant was sent the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Appellant filed no reply, and to date, the filing fee has not been paid.

In addition, the record in this appeal has not been filed. On February 21, 2007, the court reporter for this case informed that the court that payment arrangements had not been made for preparation of the reporter=s record. On March 14, 2007, the clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that the trial court denied appellant=s request to proceed without the advance payment of costs, and that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the record. On March 15, 2007, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 5, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Hudson and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 5, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 5, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-01105-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.R.G., a Child

On Appeal from the 308th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-30425

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment terminating the parental rights of appellant, Yeyde Anton, signed December 6, 2006. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on December 8, 2006. The appellate filing fee was not paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 5; see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005). On January 4, 2007, appellant was sent the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Appellant filed no reply, and to date, the filing fee has not been paid.

In addition, the record in this appeal has not been filed. On February 21, 2007, the court reporter for this case informed that the court that payment arrangements had not been made for preparation of the reporter=s record. On March 14, 2007, the clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that the trial court denied appellant=s request to proceed without the advance payment of costs, and that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the record. On March 15, 2007, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 5, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Hudson and Guzman.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of P.R.G a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-prg-a-child-texapp-2007.