in the Interest of P.R.A. and M.V.A., Children

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of P.R.A. and M.V.A., Children

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 26, 2019·No. 14-18-01113-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 26, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-01113-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.R.A. AND M.V.A., CHILDREN,

On Appeal from the 245th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-47980

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a contempt order. A court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to review a contempt order on direct appeal. Tex. Animal Health Comm’n v. Nunley, 647 S.W.2d 951, 952 (Tex. 1983).

On October 22, 2019, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before November 4, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 26, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-01113-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.R.A. AND M.V.A., CHILDREN,

On Appeal from the 245th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-47980

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a contempt order. A court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to review a contempt order on direct appeal. Tex. Animal Health Comm’n v. Nunley, 647 S.W.2d 951, 952 (Tex. 1983).

On October 22, 2019, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before November 4, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.

in the Interest of P.R.A. and M.V.A., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

in the Interest of P.R.A. and M.V.A., Children (in the Interest of P.R.A. and M.V.A., Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related