in the Interest of P.P.G., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of P.P.G., a Child

DecidedAugust 25, 2016

Docket04-16-00506-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of P.P.G., a Child (in the Interest of P.P.G., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of P.P.G., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 25, 2016

No. 04-16-00506-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.P.G., A CHILD,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1997-CI-06180 Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

ORDER On April 27, 2016, the trial court signed an order fining appellant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (JPMC) for failure to comply with a child support lien against an obligor with an account at JPMC. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial. A notice of appeal was due on July 26, 2016, and a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on August 10, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. On August 3, 2016, after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, Appellant filed a notice of appeal. See generally Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[A] motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant acting in good faith files a [notice of appeal] beyond the time allowed by Rule [26.1], but within the fifteen-day period in which the appellant would be entitled to move to extend the filing deadline under Rule [26.3].” (emphasis added)). We ORDER Appellant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b) (requirements for a motion for extension of time); Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 774 S.W.2d 668, 670 (Tex. 1989) (reasonable explanation); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a) (dismissal for want of jurisdiction). If Appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed. See id. R. 42.3(c) (dismissal for failure to comply with court order). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of August, 2016.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 25, 2016

No. 04-16-00506-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.P.G., A CHILD,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1997-CI-06180 Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

ORDER On April 27, 2016, the trial court signed an order fining appellant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (JPMC) for failure to comply with a child support lien against an obligor with an account at JPMC. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial. A notice of appeal was due on July 26, 2016, and a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on August 10, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. On August 3, 2016, after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, Appellant filed a notice of appeal. See generally Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[A] motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant acting in good faith files a [notice of appeal] beyond the time allowed by Rule [26.1], but within the fifteen-day period in which the appellant would be entitled to move to extend the filing deadline under Rule [26.3].” (emphasis added)). We ORDER Appellant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b) (requirements for a motion for extension of time); Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 774 S.W.2d 668, 670 (Tex. 1989) (reasonable explanation); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a) (dismissal for want of jurisdiction). If Appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed. See id. R. 42.3(c) (dismissal for failure to comply with court order). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of August, 2016.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of P.P.G., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ppg-a-child-texapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack