in the Interest of N.J.A.G and L.G., Children

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of N.J.A.G and L.G., Children

DecidedSeptember 7, 2006

Docket14-06-00508-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of N.J.A.G and L.G., Children (in the Interest of N.J.A.G and L.G., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of N.J.A.G and L.G., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 7, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 7, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00508-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.J.A.G. and L.G., Children

On Appeal from the 313th District Court

Harris County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 05-10948J

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Sheila Crady, appeals from a judgment signed May 16, 2006, terminating her parental rights to the minor children who are the subject of this appeal. No clerk=s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not establish indigency or make arrangements to pay for the record.

On August 7, 2006, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant filed no response.

In addition, our records show that appellant has not paid the $125.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent);Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same). After being given the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed September 7, 2006.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 7, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 7, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00508-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.J.A.G. and L.G., Children

On Appeal from the 313th District Court

Harris County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 05-10948J

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Sheila Crady, appeals from a judgment signed May 16, 2006, terminating her parental rights to the minor children who are the subject of this appeal. No clerk=s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not establish indigency or make arrangements to pay for the record.

On August 7, 2006, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant filed no response.

In addition, our records show that appellant has not paid the $125.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent);Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same). After being given the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed September 7, 2006.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Seymore.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of N.J.A.G and L.G., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-njag-and-lg-children-texapp-2006.