In the Interest of N.G., a Child v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Interest of N.G., a Child v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of N.G., a Child v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00668-CV ___________________________
IN THE INTEREST OF N.G., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 325th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 325-505917-11
Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant L.G. attempts to appeal from the trial court’s “Order Enforcing and
Modifying Support Obligation” signed on August 18, 2016 (the Order). Because L.G.
timely filed a motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due November 16, 2016—
ninety days after the Order’s signing. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1). But L.G. did not
file his notice of appeal until December 3, 2025, making it untimely. See id.
We notified the parties by letter of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over
this appeal because the notice of appeal was untimely. See id. We warned that we
could dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction unless L.G. or any party wanting to
continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing it. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. Although we received a response from L.G., it does not show
grounds for continuing the appeal.
The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and without
a timely filed notice of appeal or a timely filed extension request, we must dismiss the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 25.1(b), 26.1, 26.3; Jones v. City of Houston, 976 S.W.2d
676, 677 (Tex. 1998); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because
L.G.’s notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Amick v. Campbell, No. 02-24-00540-CV, 2025 WL
285339, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 23, 2025, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“Because
Amick’s notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss this appeal for want of
jurisdiction.”).
2 /s/ Dana Womack
Dana Womack Justice
Delivered: January 8, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of N.G., a Child v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ng-a-child-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp2-2026.