in the Interest of N.A.F., M.J.F., and O.J.F., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 18, 2017
Docket05-17-00470-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of N.A.F., M.J.F., and O.J.F., Children (in the Interest of N.A.F., M.J.F., and O.J.F., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of N.A.F., M.J.F., and O.J.F., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order entered September 18, 2017

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00470-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A.F., M.J.F., AND O.J.F., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-15-01912

ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Francis, and Justice Stoddart

Before the Court are appellant’s September 1, 2017 motion to reinstate and the court

reporter’s September 5, 2017 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record.

This appeal was dismissed on August 31, 2017, after appellant failed to comply with our

directive to provide written verification she had either paid or made arrangements to pay for the

clerk’s record or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). In her motion to reinstate, appellant does not mention she has paid for the

clerk’s record, but states she has paid the appellate court filing fee and the fee for the reporter’s

record. The reporter acknowledges payment in her extension request and asks for an additional

ten days to file the record.

We construe appellant’s motion as a motion for rehearing. We GRANT the motion to

the extent we REINSTATE the appeal and ORDER appellant to file, within ten days of the date of this order, written verification she has paid the fee for preparation of the clerk’s record. We

caution appellant this appeal will be dismissed without further notice if she fails to timely

comply. See id. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

We note the reporter’s record was filed September 12, 2017. Accordingly, we DENY the

extension request as moot.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of N.A.F., M.J.F., and O.J.F., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-naf-mjf-and-ojf-children-texapp-2017.