In the Interest of N. A. B.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

In the Interest of N. A. B.

397 S.E.2d 301, 196 Ga. App. 819, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 1087

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 5, 1990

DocketA90A1769

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 397 S.E.2d 301 (In the Interest of N. A. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of N. A. B., 397 S.E.2d 301, 196 Ga. App. 819, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 1087 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

The father of twin minor girls, N. A. B. and D. N. B., filed a petition in the Juvenile Court of Madison County alleging that the children were deprived under OCGA § 15-11-2 (8) and moved the court to place custody of the children in him. After a final hearing on the matter, the juvenile court found no merit in the allegations of the father’s complaint and returned custody of the children (who had been temporarily transferred to the Department of Family & Children Services) to their mother. The father filed a notice of appeal but did not, however, file an application with this court for a discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). “ ‘This court has held that appeals from orders dealing with child custody which are not filed pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 . . . must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Cit.)’ [Cit.]” Brandenburg v. Brandenburg, 175 Ga. App. 20 (332 SE2d 664) (1985).

Appeal dismissed.

Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sognier, Judge.

The father of twin minor girls, N. A. B. and D. N. B., filed a petition in the Juvenile Court of Madison County alleging that the children were deprived under OCGA § 15-11-2 (8) and moved the court to place custody of the children in him. After a final hearing on the matter, the juvenile court found no merit in the allegations of the father’s complaint and returned custody of the children (who had been temporarily transferred to the Department of Family & Children Services) to their mother. The father filed a notice of appeal but did not, however, file an application with this court for a discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). “ ‘This court has held that appeals from orders dealing with child custody which are not filed pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 . . . must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Cit.)’ [Cit.]” Brandenburg v. Brandenburg, 175 Ga. App. 20 (332 SE2d 664) (1985).

Appeal dismissed.

Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

397 S.E.2d 301, 196 Ga. App. 819, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 1087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-n-a-b-gactapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack