in the Interest of M.W.M., Jr., a Minor Child
This text of in the Interest of M.W.M., Jr., a Minor Child (in the Interest of M.W.M., Jr., a Minor Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered March 7, 2018
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01309-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M.W.M., JR., A MINOR CHILD
On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-07-04168-Z
ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Brown, and Justice Whitehill
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration of issues raised by
appellee in a motion for judgment. On November 16, 2017, we stayed “all trial court
proceedings” relating to that motion as well as appellee’s application for turnover relief,
appellee’s motion to compel production of documents, and any motions or requests of appellee
seeking post-judgment remedies or post-judgment discovery from appellant or third parties,
including but not limited to the hearings set for November 21, 2017 and December 14, 2017.”
Before the Court now are appellee’s motion for contempt, appellee’s motion to modify
the November 16th stay order, and appellant’s response to the motion to modify. Appellee’s
motions stem from an arbitration proceeding commenced at appellant’s request after we entered
the stay order. The arbitration concerned issues separate from those raised in this appeal and
resulted in an award rendered December 21, 2017. By the motion for contempt, appellee argues appellant should be held in contempt, and
the arbitration award declared void, because the arbitration violated the stay order. Appellee
further argues that a temporary injunction granted by the 14th Judicial District Court based on the
arbitration award should also be declared void. In the event the Court does not grant the motion
for contempt, appellee argues in her motion to modify that she should be relieved of the stay so
she may file with the trial court below a motion to vacate the arbitration award.
Because our November 16th order stayed only trial court proceedings related to the
identified motions, we DENY the motions for contempt and to modify.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of M.W.M., Jr., a Minor Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mwm-jr-a-minor-child-texapp-2018.