in the Interest of M.W.M., Jr., a Minor Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 7, 2018
Docket05-17-01309-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of M.W.M., Jr., a Minor Child (in the Interest of M.W.M., Jr., a Minor Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of M.W.M., Jr., a Minor Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Order entered March 7, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01309-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.W.M., JR., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-07-04168-Z

ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Brown, and Justice Whitehill

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration of issues raised by

appellee in a motion for judgment. On November 16, 2017, we stayed “all trial court

proceedings” relating to that motion as well as appellee’s application for turnover relief,

appellee’s motion to compel production of documents, and any motions or requests of appellee

seeking post-judgment remedies or post-judgment discovery from appellant or third parties,

including but not limited to the hearings set for November 21, 2017 and December 14, 2017.”

Before the Court now are appellee’s motion for contempt, appellee’s motion to modify

the November 16th stay order, and appellant’s response to the motion to modify. Appellee’s

motions stem from an arbitration proceeding commenced at appellant’s request after we entered

the stay order. The arbitration concerned issues separate from those raised in this appeal and

resulted in an award rendered December 21, 2017. By the motion for contempt, appellee argues appellant should be held in contempt, and

the arbitration award declared void, because the arbitration violated the stay order. Appellee

further argues that a temporary injunction granted by the 14th Judicial District Court based on the

arbitration award should also be declared void. In the event the Court does not grant the motion

for contempt, appellee argues in her motion to modify that she should be relieved of the stay so

she may file with the trial court below a motion to vacate the arbitration award.

Because our November 16th order stayed only trial court proceedings related to the

identified motions, we DENY the motions for contempt and to modify.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of M.W.M., Jr., a Minor Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mwm-jr-a-minor-child-texapp-2018.