in the Interest of M.T.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 28, 2012·No. 04-12-00814-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00814-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.T.

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-PA-01585 Honorable Fred Shannon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2012

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant Mother seeks to appeal from an order terminating her parental rights to M.T.

The clerk’s record reflects that on December 8, 2011, the trial court signed an order terminating

Appellant Mother’s parental rights to M.T. The record reflects that in a separate order, also on

December 8, 2011, the trial court terminated Appellant Father’s parental rights to M.T. Thus, the

notice of appeal was due to be filed by December 28, 2011. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b).

Appellant Mother did not file her notice of appeal until December 4, 2012, almost a year after

the final judgment was signed in this case.

Appellant Mother has filed a motion for leave to file an untimely motion for extension of

time to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b). However, we have no jurisdiction to

grant such a motion. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the 04-12-00814-CV

predecessor to Rule 26). Therefore, we DENY appellant’s motion for leave to file an untimely

motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal and DISMISS this appeal for lack of

jurisdiction.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of M.T., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in the Interest of M.T. (in the Interest of M.T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)