in the Interest of M.R.R., a Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 28, 2011
Docket04-11-00484-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of M.R.R., a Child (in the Interest of M.R.R., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of M.R.R., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00484-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.R.R., a Child

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-CI-15120 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 28, 2011

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On October 20, 2009, an order in suit to modify the parent-child relationship and an order

for contempt was entered against appellee, Lisa Bronstad. On September 9, 2010, Bronstad filed

an original petition for bill of review in the trial court, seeking to vacate these orders. On June

13, 2011, the trial court granted the petition for bill of review and vacated these orders. Appellant

Peter Ray Rios then filed a notice of appeal.

In Jordan v. Jordan, 907 S.W.2d 471, 472 (Tex. 1995), the supreme court held that “[a]

bill of review [that] sets aside a prior judgment but does not dispose of the case on the merits is

interlocutory and not appealable.” See also Hartford Underwriters Ins. v. Mills, 110 S.W.3d 588, 04-11-00484-CV

591 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, no pet.). Thus, the supreme court held that the court of

appeals lacked jurisdiction over the appeal. Jordan, 907 S.W.2d at 472.

Therefore, on August 24, 2011, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal

should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this

appeal without prejudice, agreeing that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. We, therefore, grant

the motion and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jordan v. Jordan
907 S.W.2d 471 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)
Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Mills
110 S.W.3d 588 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of M.R.R., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mrr-a-child-texapp-2011.