In the Interest of M.N.

505 S.W.3d 618, 59 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 606, 2016 WL 1267575, 2016 Tex. LEXIS 240
Texas Supreme Court·Decided April 1, 2016·No. NO. 15-0531·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This Court Abated This Case To Consider Whether Petitioner, a pro se indigent parent in a government-initiated parental rights termination suit, has a statutory right to appointed counsel to pursue a petition for review. The trial court terminated mother’s rights to her three children, then ten, twelve, and fourteen, and the court of appeals affirmed.

In this Court, mother filed a pro se unopposed motion for extension of time, indicating that she is disabled and without funds at this time to hire an attorney. No response or other document has been filed by the Department. In light of our opinion in In re P.M., — S.W.3d -, 2016 WL 1274748 (Tex.2016), we refer this case to the trial court for the appointment of counsel. We direct the trial court to report on the appointment to the Court within thirty days. The case remains abated until further order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of M.N., 505 S.W.3d 618, 59 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 606, 2016 WL 1267575, 2016 Tex. LEXIS 240 (Tex. 2016).

505 S.W.3d 618 (In the Interest of M.N.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

in the Interest of P.M., a Child
520 S.W.3d 24 (Texas Supreme Court, 2016)