in the Interest of M.M.M., a Minor Child

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 30, 2019·No. 05-19-00931-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismissed; Opinion Filed August 30, 2019.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00931-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M.M., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1-11-1233

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Nowell Opinion by Justice Nowell

By notice of appeal filed August 6, 2019, Mother challenges the trial court’s “unsupported

restraining order affecting visitation” and “all custody orders.” Because we conclude we lack

jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

As reflected in the record, the trial court signed an order in suit to modify parent-child

relationship on February 24, 2017. Four months later, Father filed another suit to modify. The

suit remains pending.

During the thirty months the suit has been pending, the trial court has issued the following

orders: (1) on July 21, 2017, a temporary restraining order that, by subsequent agreement, expired

October 13, 2017; (2) on June 13, 2018, temporary orders concerning Mother’s summer

possession; and, (3) on August 6, 2019, temporary orders setting visitation in Rockwall and

contiguous counties and granting Mother unsupervised visitation by agreement with Father. Because temporary orders in family law cases are not appealable and the only final

judgment in the record was signed more than two years ago, we questioned our jurisdiction over

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1 (governing deadlines for civil appeals); TEX. FAM. CODE ANN.

§ 109.002(b) (allowing appeals from final orders in suits affecting the parent-child relationship).

We directed Mother to file a letter brief addressing our concern.1 Although she complied, the letter

brief fails to demonstrate we have jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, because no

appealable order or judgment exists in the record, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1,

42.3(a); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (appeal may only be

taken from order authorized by statute or final judgment that disposes of all parties and claims).

/Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

190931F.P05

1 In her letter brief, Mother refers to two restraining orders, one which appears to have been issued June 3, 2016 and the other which she asserts was issued June 29, 2017. The record, however, does not include the June 2017 restraining order or otherwise reflect an order was issued on that day.

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M.M., A On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District MINOR CHILD Court, Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1-11-1233. No. 05-19-00931-CV Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell, Chief Justice Burns and Justice Molberg participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 30th day of August, 2019.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of M.M.M., a Minor Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in the Interest of M.M.M., a Minor Child (in the Interest of M.M.M., a Minor Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps
842 S.W.2d 266 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)