In the Interest of M.M.L.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of M.M.L.

497 S.W.3d 353, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 843, 2016 WL 4525301

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 30, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103963

StatusPublished

This text of 497 S.W.3d 353 (In the Interest of M.M.L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of M.M.L., 497 S.W.3d 353, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 843, 2016 WL 4525301 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

J.N.L. (“Mother”) appeals the juvenile court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her son, M.M.L. (“Child”). Mother raises two points on appeal: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that Mother neglected Child; and 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that termination of Mother’s parental rights was in the best interest of Child. Finding that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for then-information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

J.N.L. (“Mother”) appeals the juvenile court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her son, M.M.L. (“Child”). Mother raises two points on appeal: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that Mother neglected Child; and 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that termination of Mother’s parental rights was in the best interest of Child. Finding that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for then-information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 S.W.3d 353, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 843, 2016 WL 4525301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mml-moctapp-2016.