In the Interest of M.M.L.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of M.M.L.

497 S.W.3d 353, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 843, 2016 WL 4525301

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 2016·No. No. ED 103963·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

J.N.L. (“Mother”) appeals the juvenile court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her son, M.M.L. (“Child”). Mother raises two points on appeal: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that Mother neglected Child; and 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that termination of Mother’s parental rights was in the best interest of Child. Finding that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for then-information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

J.N.L. (“Mother”) appeals the juvenile court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her son, M.M.L. (“Child”). Mother raises two points on appeal: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that Mother neglected Child; and 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that termination of Mother’s parental rights was in the best interest of Child. Finding that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for then-information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of M.M.L., 497 S.W.3d 353, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 843, 2016 WL 4525301 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

497 S.W.3d 353 (In the Interest of M.M.L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.