in the Interest of M.M., C.M., E.M., and I.M., Children

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 31, 2011·No. 02-11-00165-CV·Published

Opinion

02-11-165-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00165-CV

In the Interest of M.M., C.M., E.M., and I.M., Children

------------

FROM THE 211th District Court OF Denton COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

On August 8, 2011, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2).  See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).  We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record and provided this court with proof of payment. 

Because appellant has not provided proof of payment arrangements for the clerk=s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.   Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J. and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED:  August 31, 2011




[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of M.M., C.M., E.M., and I.M., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

in the Interest of M.M., C.M., E.M., and I.M., Children (in the Interest of M.M., C.M., E.M., and I.M., Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.