in the Interest of M.L.M.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
NO. 09-18-00242-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M.L.M.
_______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 16-02-01355-CV ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 18, 2018, Joseph Garza filed a notice of appeal from a judgment signed on January 9, 2018. On June 25, 2018, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal had been filed outside the time for which an extension of time may be granted for filing a notice of appeal in a regular appeal and warned the appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless grounds were shown for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 26.3, 42.3. On July 26, 2018, we warned the appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless he filed an amended notice of appeal for a
restricted appeal by August 10, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d)(7). No response has been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice
Submitted on August 30, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 31, 2018
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of M.L.M. (in the Interest of M.L.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.