in the Interest of M.L.M.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00242-CV ____________________
IN THE INTEREST OF M.L.M.
_______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 16-02-01355-CV ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 18, 2018, Joseph Garza filed a notice of appeal from a judgment
signed on January 9, 2018. On June 25, 2018, we notified the parties that the notice
of appeal had been filed outside the time for which an extension of time may be
granted for filing a notice of appeal in a regular appeal and warned the appellant that
the appeal would be dismissed unless grounds were shown for continuing the appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 26.3, 42.3. On July 26, 2018, we warned the appellant that
the appeal would be dismissed unless he filed an amended notice of appeal for a
1 restricted appeal by August 10, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d)(7). No response
has been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice
Submitted on August 30, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 31, 2018
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of M.L.M. (in the Interest of M.L.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.