in the Interest of M.L., Jr., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 7, 2009
Docket04-08-00413-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of M.L., Jr., Children (in the Interest of M.L., Jr., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of M.L., Jr., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion





MEMORANDUM OPINION



No. 04-08-00413-CV


IN THE INTEREST OF M.L., JR., E.L., AND S.L., CHILDREN


From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2007-PA-01654
Honorable Charles Montemayor, Judge Presiding


Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice



Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice



Delivered and Filed: January 7, 2009



AFFIRMED

This appeal concerns the trial court's termination of Rebecca A.'s and Mario L.'s parental rights to their three children, M.L., Jr., E.L., and S.L. (1) The court-appointed appellate attorney for Rebecca and Mario has moved to withdraw as counsel for Rebecca and Mario and filed Anders briefs in support of his request to withdraw. In his briefs, counsel concludes that Rebecca's and Mario's appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel's briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.--San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights).

Rebecca and Mario were delivered a copy of counsel's briefs, and both were advised of their right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se briefs have been filed. After reviewing the record, we agree that Rebecca's and Mario's appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant counsel's request to withdraw as counsel for Rebecca and Mario.



Catherine Stone, Chief Justice



1. To protect the privacy of the parties in this case, we identify the children by their initials and the parents by their first names only. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 109.002(d) (Vernon 2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of M.L., Jr., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ml-jr-children-texapp-2009.