In the Interest of M.K. and O.K., Children v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Interest of M.K. and O.K., Children v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of M.K. and O.K., Children v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-24-00060-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M.K. AND O.K., CHILDREN
On Appeal from the County Court at Law Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 23C0495-CCL
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. The reporter’s record, the clerk’s record, and a
supplemental clerk’s record were filed on August 19, 2024. Appellant’s pro se appellate brief
was due on October 22. When neither a brief nor a motion to extend time for filing same was
received by November 4, this Court advised Appellant by letter that her brief was late. We also
warned Appellant that the failure to file a brief by November 19 would subject this appeal to
dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).
Appellant did not respond to our communication and did not file an appellate brief.
Because we received no response to our letter of November 4, we dismissed Appellant’s appeal
for want of prosecution pursuant to Rules 38.8 and 42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).
On December 6, Appellant filed a motion for rehearing asking this Court to reconsider its
dismissal of her appeal for want of prosecution. Appellant stated that she had been hospitalized
from November 3 through November 24 and that she did not receive our November 4 letter in
time to file her brief by November 19. She also stated in her motion that she had already
prepared her appellate brief and was prepared to file it should the Court reinstate her case.1
In the interest of justice, on December 12, the Court granted Appellant’s motion for
rehearing, withdrew its previous memorandum opinion and judgment, and reinstated the appeal
on the Court’s docket. The Court also informed Appellant that her brief would be due on or
before December 19. Appellant did not file her appellate brief by the stated date.
1 Appellee had no objection to Appellant’s motion for rehearing. 2 Consequently, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to Rules 38.8 and
42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).
Jeff Rambin Justice
Date Submitted: January 8, 2025 Date Decided: January 9, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of M.K. and O.K., Children v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mk-and-ok-children-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.