In the Interest of M.F. & D.F. v. Juvenile Officer

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of M.F. & D.F. v. Juvenile Officer

372 S.W.3d 923, 2012 WL 3288744, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 995

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 14, 2012·No. Nos. WD 74469, WD 74470·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

A.F. appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her children, M.F. and D.F., pursuant to section 211.447.5(8), RSMo Cum.Supp. 2011. She contends that clear, cogent, and convincing evidence did not support the trial court’s finding under section 211.447.7(4) that there are no additional services which would be likely to bring about lasting parental adjustment enabling a return of the children to Mother within an ascertainable period of time. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

A.F. appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her children, M.F. and D.F., pursuant to section 211.447.5(8), RSMo Cum.Supp. 2011. She contends that clear, cogent, and convincing evidence did not support the trial court’s finding under section 211.447.7(4) that there are no additional services which would be likely to bring about lasting parental adjustment enabling a return of the children to Mother within an ascertainable period of time. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of M.F. & D.F. v. Juvenile Officer, 372 S.W.3d 923, 2012 WL 3288744, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 995 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

372 S.W.3d 923 (In the Interest of M.F. & D.F. v. Juvenile Officer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.