in the Interest of M.E.J, W.D.J, and T.M.J
This text of in the Interest of M.E.J, W.D.J, and T.M.J (in the Interest of M.E.J, W.D.J, and T.M.J) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed June 11, 2013.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00055-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M.E.J, W.D.J, AND T.M.J, CHILDREN
On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-07-10155
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Francis, and Fillmore
The Court has before it appellant Zoe Michelle Jackman’s May 30, 2013 unopposed
motion to dismiss appeal. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a).
PER CURIAM
130055F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF M.E.J, W.D.J, AND On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District T.M.J, CHILDREN Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-07-10155. No. 05-13-00055-CV Opinion delivered per curiam. Justices O'Neill, Francis and Fillmore sitting for the Court.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee William David Jackman recover his costs of this appeal from appellant Zoe Michelle Jackman.
Judgment entered this 11th day of June, 2013.
/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of M.E.J, W.D.J, and T.M.J, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mej-wdj-and-tmj-texapp-2013.