In the Interest of M.D.W. v. R.J.W.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of M.D.W. v. R.J.W.

188 S.W.3d 491, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 567

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 18, 2006

DocketNo. WD 65840

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 S.W.3d 491 (In the Interest of M.D.W. v. R.J.W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of M.D.W. v. R.J.W., 188 S.W.3d 491, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 567 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

R.J.W. appeals the judgment terminating his parental rights and allowing M.D.W. to be adopted by J.L.C. and B.O.C., pursuant to section 453.040(7) RSMo 2000. R.J.W. argues on appeal that the trial court’s findings that he willfully [492]*492abandoned M.D.W. for at least six months prior to the filing of the petition for adoption and that he willfully, substantially, and continuously neglected to provide M.D.W. with necessary care and protection for at least six months prior to the filing of the petition for adoption were against the weight of the evidence. He also argues the trial court’s finding that the adoption of M.D.W. by J.L.C. and B.O.C. is in M.D.W.’s best interests is against the weight of the evidence. R.J.W.’s points are denied, and the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

R.J.W. appeals the judgment terminating his parental rights and allowing M.D.W. to be adopted by J.L.C. and B.O.C., pursuant to section 453.040(7) RSMo 2000. R.J.W. argues on appeal that the trial court’s findings that he willfully [492]*492abandoned M.D.W. for at least six months prior to the filing of the petition for adoption and that he willfully, substantially, and continuously neglected to provide M.D.W. with necessary care and protection for at least six months prior to the filing of the petition for adoption were against the weight of the evidence. He also argues the trial court’s finding that the adoption of M.D.W. by J.L.C. and B.O.C. is in M.D.W.’s best interests is against the weight of the evidence. R.J.W.’s points are denied, and the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 S.W.3d 491, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mdw-v-rjw-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack