In the Interest of M.D.C., a Child v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 14, 2024
Docket04-24-00309-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In the Interest of M.D.C., a Child v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of M.D.C., a Child v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of M.D.C., a Child v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00309-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.D.C., a Child

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024EM500751 Honorable Eric J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 14, 2024

DISMISSED

By order dated July 3, 2024, appellant was instructed to show cause in writing by July 13,

2024, that either: (1) the $205.00 filing fee for this appeal had been paid; or (2) appellant was

entitled to appeal without paying the filing fee. Our record contains no evidence that appellant is

excused by statute or rule from paying the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20. Appellant was

advised that if appellant failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed

for failure to pay the filing fee. See id. R. 5, 42.3(c). Appellant did not respond or pay the filing

fee.

Additionally, on July 2, 2024, the trial court clerk notified this court that the clerk’s record

was not filed when it was originally due because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements

to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and appellant was not entitled to appeal without 04-24-00309-CV

paying the fee. On July 3, 2024, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing by July 13,

2024, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not respond.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee and for want of

prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Interest of M.D.C., a Child v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mdc-a-child-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.