in the Interest of M.B., III, Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 15, 2009
Docket04-08-00795-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of M.B., III, Children (in the Interest of M.B., III, Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of M.B., III, Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00795-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.B., III, et al., Children, Appellant

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-PA-02231 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 15, 2009

AFFIRMED

After the trial court terminated her parental rights, Monica C. appealed the trial court’s

finding that an appeal of the termination order would be frivolous. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN.

§ 263.405(g) (Vernon 2002). Monica C’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief

containing a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating that there are no arguable

grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The

brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); see also In re R.R.,

No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no 04-08-00795-CV

pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights) (mem. op.); In re

K.M., 98 S.W.3d 774 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, order) (same).

Counsel certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to Monica C who was advised of

her right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After

reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of

the trial court is, therefore, affirmed and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In the Interest of K.M.
98 S.W.3d 774 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of M.B., III, Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-mb-iii-children-texapp-2009.