in the Interest of M.A.J.Jr., H.A.J., and B.D.J., Children v. Department of Family and Protective Services

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 10, 2020·No. 01-19-00685-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.A.J. Jr., H.A.J., and B.D.J., Children

Appellate case number: 01-19-00685-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-04197J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: July 10, 2020

Party filing motion: Appellee

A majority of the en banc court has voted to deny appellee’s motion for en banc reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Julie Countiss_________ Acting for the En Banc Court*

Date: ___December 10, 2020___________________

* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.

Keyes, J., dissenting from the denial of en banc reconsideration for reasons stated in her dissenting opinion on rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of M.A.J.Jr., H.A.J., and B.D.J., Children v. Department of Family and Protective Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

in the Interest of M.A.J.Jr., H.A.J., and B.D.J., Children v. Department of Family and Protective Services (in the Interest of M.A.J.Jr., H.A.J., and B.D.J., Children v. Department of Family and Protective Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.