in the Interest of M.A.J.Jr., H.A.J., and B.D.J., Children v. Department of Family and Protective Services
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION
Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.A.J. Jr., H.A.J., and B.D.J., Children
Appellate case number: 01-19-00685-CV
Trial court case number: 2018-04197J
Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County
Date motion filed: July 10, 2020
Party filing motion: Appellee
A majority of the en banc court has voted to deny appellee’s motion for en banc reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied.
Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Julie Countiss_________ Acting for the En Banc Court*
Date: ___December 10, 2020___________________
* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.
Keyes, J., dissenting from the denial of en banc reconsideration for reasons stated in her dissenting opinion on rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of M.A.J.Jr., H.A.J., and B.D.J., Children v. Department of Family and Protective Services (in the Interest of M.A.J.Jr., H.A.J., and B.D.J., Children v. Department of Family and Protective Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.