in the Interest Of: M.A.A.
This text of in the Interest Of: M.A.A. (in the Interest Of: M.A.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered July 27, 2017
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01180-CV
IN RE M.A.A.
On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 01-09-843
ORDER
Appellant Sherry Rhodes appealed an order affecting the parent child relationship. On
August 23, 2016, we issued our judgment affirming the trial court’s order. On January 3, 2017,
we denied Rhodes’s motion for en banc reconsideration. As a result, this Court’s plenary
jurisdiction over this appeal, including our jurisdiction over our own judgment and the trial court
order on appeal expired on February 2, 2017. As of that date, this Court has had no jurisdiction
to entertain any further challenges related to the trial court proceedings or the merits of this
appeal.
Rhodes subsequently filed a premature motion to stay the execution of our mandate and a
timely motion to extend the time to file a petition for discretionary review with the Texas
Supreme Court. On March 26, 2017, the Supreme Court denied Rhodes’s motion to extend the
time to file a petition for discretionary review. On June 13, 2017, Rhodes filed a motion to supplement the record, motion to dismiss
appeal, and motion to extend stay of mandate. In her motion, Rhodes raises various complaints
regarding our judgment, as well as the trial court’s judgment that was on appeal. Rhodes has not
shown, and does not contend, that she has filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the United State
Supreme Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.2 (grounds for staying issuance of mandate).
Rhodes’s motion to stay issuance of the mandate is DENIED.
We have no jurisdiction to consider Rhodes’s other requests for relief. Rhodes has
exhausted her appellate remedies.
Rhodes’s remaining pending motions are DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest Of: M.A.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-maa-texapp-2017.