In the Interest of M.A.
609 So. 2d 597, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 740, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2045, 1992 WL 354461
Opinion
We review In re M.A., 593 So.2d 521, 522 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), in which the court certified the following question as being of great public importance:
WHETHER A NON-FINAL ORDER IN A DEPENDENCY PROCEEDING TRANSFERRING CUSTODY OF A MINOR FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES MAY BE REVIEWED UNDER FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii)?
We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.
Upon the authority of Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Honeycutt, 609 So.2d 596 (Fla.1992), we answer the certified question in the negative and approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Interest of M.A., 609 So. 2d 597, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 740, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2045, 1992 WL 354461 (Fla. 1992).
609 So. 2d 597 (In the Interest of M.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
AP v. Department of Children and Families
957 So. 2d 686 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)