in the Interest of M. S. G., a Child
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00526-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
IN THE INTEREST OF M. S. G., A CHILD ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 156th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Kevin Michael Garcia, attempts to appeal a judgment of contempt
entered against him on January 26, 2011. This court does not have jurisdiction to review
contempt orders by direct appeal. See Norman v. Norman, 692 S.W.2d 655, 655 (Tex.
1985); Tracy v. Tracy, 219 S.W.3d 527, 530 (Tex. App.BDallas 2007, no pet.). Contempt
orders may be reviewed only by an application for a writ of habeas corpus, if the
contemnor has been confined, or by a petition for a writ of mandamus, if the contemnor has not been confined. See Rosser v. Squier, 902 S.W.2d 962, 962 (Tex. 1995); Ex
parte Williams, 690 S.W.2d 243, 243 (Tex. 1985); Tracy, 219 S.W.3d at 290.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the
opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the
appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.3(a), (c). All pending motions are likewise DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 10th day of November, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of M. S. G., a Child (in the Interest of M. S. G., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.