in the Interest of M. P. H., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of M. P. H., a Child

DecidedJuly 30, 2010

Docket12-10-00200-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of M. P. H., a Child (in the Interest of M. P. H., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of M. P. H., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-10-00200-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS IN THE INTEREST ' APPEAL FROM THE 307TH

OF M.P.H., ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

A CHILD ' GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This pro se appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on May 28, 2010. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment. On June 24, 2010, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). She was further notified that unless she filed an amended notice of appeal on or before July 26, 2010, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). On July 21, 2010, Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal. However, the amended notice did not cure the defect. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04-00004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, No. 12-03-00442- CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied). Opinion delivered July 30, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-10-00200-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS IN THE INTEREST ' APPEAL FROM THE 307TH

OF M.P.H., ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

A CHILD ' GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This pro se appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on May 28, 2010. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment. On June 24, 2010, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). She was further notified that unless she filed an amended notice of appeal on or before July 26, 2010, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). On July 21, 2010, Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal. However, the amended notice did not cure the defect. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04-00004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, No. 12-03-00442- CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied). Opinion delivered July 30, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of M. P. H., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-m-p-h-a-child-texapp-2010.