in the Interest of M. O. A. S., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of M. O. A. S., a Child

DecidedJanuary 26, 2006

Docket13-05-00590-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of M. O. A. S., a Child (in the Interest of M. O. A. S., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of M. O. A. S., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-05-590-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.O.A.S., A CHILD

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Bee County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Manuela Galarza, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36th District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B-00-1512-1-CV-A. Judgment in this cause was signed on June 23, 2005. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on July 13, 2005, but was not filed until July 25, 2005.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 26th day of January, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-05-590-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.O.A.S., A CHILD

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Bee County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Manuela Galarza, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36th District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B-00-1512-1-CV-A. Judgment in this cause was signed on June 23, 2005. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on July 13, 2005, but was not filed until July 25, 2005.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 26th day of January, 2006.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of M. O. A. S., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-m-o-a-s-a-child-texapp-2006.