In the Interest of L.Y.S.B.

306 S.W.3d 652, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 151, 2010 WL 527990
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 16, 2010
DocketED 93151
StatusPublished

This text of 306 S.W.3d 652 (In the Interest of L.Y.S.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of L.Y.S.B., 306 S.W.3d 652, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 151, 2010 WL 527990 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

C.B. appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her son contending there was insufficient evidence supporting the grounds for termination and the court’s finding that termination was in the best interests of the child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s finding that grounds for termination of Mother’s parental rights existed is supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and that the court’s finding that termination was in the best interests of the child is supported by a preponderance, of the evidence. In re E.F.B.D., 245 S.W.3d 316, 319 (Mo.App. S.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

W.H. v. S.B.
245 S.W.3d 316 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 S.W.3d 652, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 151, 2010 WL 527990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-lysb-moctapp-2010.