In the Interest of L.L. v. L.L.
282 S.W.3d 398, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 419
Opinion
ORDER
L.L. appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to his children, R.D. and L.L. On appeal, he claims that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because the Juvenile Officer did not present clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support termination upon any statutory ground. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the Interest of L.L. v. L.L., 282 S.W.3d 398, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 419 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
282 S.W.3d 398 (In the Interest of L.L. v. L.L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
IN THE INTEREST OF: H.M.W. and W.E.L., children under seventeen years of age. GREENE COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE, Petitioner-Respondent v. R.W.
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2023
C.V.E. v. Greene County Juvenile Office
330 S.W.3d 560 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
R.J.M. v. Phelps County Juvenile Office
322 S.W.3d 564 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Lm
322 S.W.3d 564 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)