in the Interest of L.H.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 7, 2014·No. 04-13-00810-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 7, 2014

No. 04-13-00810-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.M.B., ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-PA-00997 Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

ORDER In this accelerated appeal, Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed an Anders brief in which counsel asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in a parental rights termination appeal). Counsel has informed Appellant of his right to file a pro se brief. The State has filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless Appellant files a pro se brief. If Appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER Appellant to do so within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). If Appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief not later than TWENTY DAYS after the date Appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. See id. R. 38.6(b). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of February, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of L.H., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in the Interest of L.H. (in the Interest of L.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)