In the Interest of L.C.K.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of L.C.K.

387 S.W.3d 421, 2012 WL 6597780, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1588

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2012·No. No. ED 97603·Published

Opinion

[422] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dusty Griggs appeals from the judgment terminating her parental rights to L.C.K., E.C.G., and R.C.G. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[422] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dusty Griggs appeals from the judgment terminating her parental rights to L.C.K., E.C.G., and R.C.G. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of L.C.K., 387 S.W.3d 421, 2012 WL 6597780, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1588 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

387 S.W.3d 421 (In the Interest of L.C.K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.