In the Interest of L.A. v. State

530 So. 2d 489, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2034, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3927, 1988 WL 91218
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 1988·No. No. 88-1047·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

BARFIELD, Judge.

We reverse the involuntary placement of appellant in the Northeast Florida State Hospital, because the criteria of section 394.467(l)(a)2.a. and 394.467(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), were not met. The mere need for treatment alone is insufficient to commit an individual, Neff v. State, 356 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Even though the other criteria might be met, a non-dangerous individual, capable of surviving safely in freedom by herself with the help of others, should not be involuntarily committed. In Re Beverly, 342 So.2d 481 (Fla.1977). See also Williams v. State, 522 So.2d 983 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), and Reigosa v. State, 362 So.2d 714 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

REVERSED.

ZEHMER, J., concurs. BOOTH, J., dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of L.A. v. State, 530 So. 2d 489, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2034, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3927, 1988 WL 91218 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

530 So. 2d 489 (In the Interest of L.A. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Singletary v. State
765 So. 2d 180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)