In the Interest of L. M. C., R. C. & R. W. C., Jr., Children v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In the Interest of L. M. C., R. C. & R. W. C., Jr., Children v. the State of Texas

DecidedAugust 15, 2024

Docket12-24-00227-CV

StatusPublished

This text of In the Interest of L. M. C., R. C. & R. W. C., Jr., Children v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of L. M. C., R. C. & R. W. C., Jr., Children v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of L. M. C., R. C. & R. W. C., Jr., Children v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-24-00227-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF § APPEAL FROM THE 420TH L. M. C., R. C. & R. W. C., JR., CHILDREN § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

§ NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant D.S.’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., July 18, 2024. On July 18, this Court requested that Appellant file a docketing statement within ten days if she had not already done so. Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested. On July 31, this Court issued a second notice advising Appellant that the docketing statement was past due. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement was filed on or before August 8, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request. Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (after giving ten days’ notice, appellate court may dismiss appeal because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time).

Opinion delivered August 15, 2024. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

AUGUST 15, 2024

IN THE INTEREST OF L. M. C., R. C. & R. W. C., JR., CHILDREN

Appeal from the 420th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. C2338248)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby dismissed; and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-24-00227-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF § APPEAL FROM THE 420TH L. M. C., R. C. & R. W. C., JR., CHILDREN § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

§ NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant D.S.’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., July 18, 2024. On July 18, this Court requested that Appellant file a docketing statement within ten days if she had not already done so. Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested. On July 31, this Court issued a second notice advising Appellant that the docketing statement was past due. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement was filed on or before August 8, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request. Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (after giving ten days’ notice, appellate court may dismiss appeal because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time).

Opinion delivered August 15, 2024. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

AUGUST 15, 2024

IN THE INTEREST OF L. M. C., R. C. & R. W. C., JR., CHILDREN

Appeal from the 420th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. C2338248)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby dismissed; and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In the Interest of L. M. C., R. C. & R. W. C., Jr., Children v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-l-m-c-r-c-r-w-c-jr-children-v-the-state-texapp-2024.