In the Interest of K.T.

971 S.W.2d 363, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1380, 1998 WL 404461
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In the Interest of K.T.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 578
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 21, 1998·No. No. 73046·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother and father appeal from the trial court’s judgment terminating their parental rights to K.T., J.T., and A.T. We find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of K.T., 971 S.W.2d 363, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1380, 1998 WL 404461 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

971 S.W.2d 363 (In the Interest of K.T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)