In the Interest of K.R.R., a Child v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 16, 2025
Docket04-25-00094-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In the Interest of K.R.R., a Child v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of K.R.R., a Child v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of K.R.R., a Child v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00094-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.R.R., a Child

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018EM505589 Honorable Nick Catoe Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 16, 2025

DISMISSED

Appellant filed a notice of appeal in this case on February 11, 2025. On March 11, 2025,

this court issued an order notifying Appellant that he had not designated the correct court reporter

in this proceeding and that he has not requested preparation of the reporter’s record. We ordered

Appellant to provide proof of his request for the reporter’s record, noting that if he failed to do so,

we would consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a

decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Appellant did not respond to our order.

On May 1, 2025, we issued another order notifying Appellant that we had no evidence that

the appellee had been served with the notice of appeal. We ordered Appellant to file a response

either certifying that he served the appellee with the notice of appeal or provide a written

explanation as to why he did not serve the notice of appeal. We cautioned Appellant that if he 04-25-00094-CV

failed to comply with our order, we could dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution, for failure

to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure, or for failure to comply with an

order of this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Again, Appellant failed to respond to our

order. Therefore, we dismiss appellant’s appeal for want of prosecution and for appellant’s failure

to comply with a court order. See id. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Interest of K.R.R., a Child v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-krr-a-child-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.