In the Interest of K.R.R., a Child v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Interest of K.R.R., a Child v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of K.R.R., a Child v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00094-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF K.R.R., a Child
From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018EM505589 Honorable Nick Catoe Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 16, 2025
DISMISSED
Appellant filed a notice of appeal in this case on February 11, 2025. On March 11, 2025,
this court issued an order notifying Appellant that he had not designated the correct court reporter
in this proceeding and that he has not requested preparation of the reporter’s record. We ordered
Appellant to provide proof of his request for the reporter’s record, noting that if he failed to do so,
we would consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a
decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Appellant did not respond to our order.
On May 1, 2025, we issued another order notifying Appellant that we had no evidence that
the appellee had been served with the notice of appeal. We ordered Appellant to file a response
either certifying that he served the appellee with the notice of appeal or provide a written
explanation as to why he did not serve the notice of appeal. We cautioned Appellant that if he 04-25-00094-CV
failed to comply with our order, we could dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution, for failure
to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure, or for failure to comply with an
order of this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Again, Appellant failed to respond to our
order. Therefore, we dismiss appellant’s appeal for want of prosecution and for appellant’s failure
to comply with a court order. See id. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of K.R.R., a Child v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-krr-a-child-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.