In the Interest of K.O. and K.Q., Children v. the State of Texas

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-23-00440-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.Q. AND K.O., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Randall County, Texas Trial Court No. 82392-L2, Honorable Dan L. Schaap, Sitting by Assignment

April 18, 2024 ORDER OF ABATMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellants, M.Q. and T.O., appeal from the trial court’s order terminating their

parental rights to their children, K.Q. and K.O., in a suit brought by Appellee, the

Department of Family and Protective Services. 1 We remand the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings.

Appellants’ briefs were originally due March 18, 2024. M.Q. has filed a brief, but

we granted T.O.’s counsel, Stacy Grant, an extension to April 8, 2024, to file a brief. In

our letter, we admonished counsel that failure to file a brief by this deadline could result

1 To protect the privacy of the parties involved, we refer to them by their initials. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b). in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further

proceedings. However, T.O. has not filed a brief to date. On April 16, 2024, counsel filed

an additional motion for extension requesting leave to file a brief that day. No brief was

filed.

Indigent persons have a statutory right to counsel in parental-rights termination

cases brought by the Department. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.013(a)(1). That right

includes the right to effective counsel through the exhaustion of the appeal. See TEX.

FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.016(2)(B) (requiring appointed counsel to serve until all appeals in

relation to any final order terminating parental rights are exhausted or waived); In re M.S.,

115 S.W.3d 534, 544 (Tex. 2003) (holding that the statutory right to counsel in parental-

rights termination cases embodies the right to effective counsel). Effective assistance of

counsel on appeal cannot be afforded without requiring that counsel file a brief on an

appellant’s behalf. Guillory v. State, 557 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977).

Accordingly, we deny T.O.’s motion for extension, abate the appeal, and remand

the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(2); In re

T.V., 8 S.W.3d 448, 449-50 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, order) (per curiam) (remanding

termination appeal for appointment of new counsel where appellant’s counsel failed to file

an appellate brief). Upon remand, due to the time-sensitive nature of an appeal from a

parental termination order, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to

appoint new counsel to represent T.O. in this appeal. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a).

The name, address, e-mail address, telephone number, and state bar number of

appointed counsel shall be provided in an order of the trial court. A supplemental clerk’s

record containing the order shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before April 29, 2 2024. Newly appointed counsel shall file T.O.’s brief twenty days after the date of

appointment. No extensions will be granted.

Should Ms. Grant file a brief with this Court on or before April 25, 2024, she is

directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial

court shall not be required to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam