in the Interest of K.N.H.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-21-00241-CV __________________
IN THE INTEREST OF K.N.H.
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 356th District Court Hardin County, Texas Trial Cause No. 53892 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jessie James Hayes, Appellant, filed a notice of appeal from a final judgment
signed on July 20, 2021. Appellant paid the filing fee for the appeal. On November
29, 2021, we notified the parties that the clerk’s record had not been filed due to
Appellant’s failure to pay, or to arrange to pay, the District Clerk’s fee for preparing
the clerk’s record and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of
prosecution unless Appellant established that he had arranged to pay the fee or that
he needed additional time to do so. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Neither of the parties
filed a response to our notice.
1 In the absence of a satisfactory explanation justifying Appellant’s failure to
arrange to pay for a clerk’s record to support his appeal, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3, 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on January 12, 2022 Opinion Delivered January 13, 2022
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of K.N.H. (in the Interest of K.N.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.