in the Interest of K.M.W., a Child
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00201-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.D., A CHILD
NO. 02-13-00202-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF K.M.W., A CHILD
------------
FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
These appeals are from suits for termination of appellant A.M.P.’s parental
rights to her children, A.R.D. and K.M.W. The suits were initiated by the
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. children’s grandparents, who have been the children’s managing conservators
since 2005. The Department of Family and Protective Services is not a party to
the cases.
Appellant’s brief was due in this court by July 11, 2013. On July 18, 2013,
the clerk of the court notified appellant’s counsel of this fact and notified
appellant’s counsel that the appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution
unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a
motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the need for an
extension by July 29, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a). Appellant’s counsel
did not respond.
Because this case involves the termination of appellant’s parental rights to
her children, we abated the appeals and remanded to the trial court for a hearing
to determine whether appellant desired to continue the appeal and whether
retained counsel for appellant had abandoned the appeal. The trial court
conducted a hearing on August 14, 2013, and appellant testified at the hearing
that she no longer wished to appeal. While it would have been preferable for
appellant to have filed motions to dismiss these appeals to avoid the expenditure
of further resources, the court is satisfied that appellant no longer desires to
prosecute either of these appeals. Having previously notified appellant that
these appeals would be dismissed for want of prosecution for her failure to file an
appellant’s brief, we do so now.
2 These appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.
38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let
execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DELIVERED: August 29, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of K.M.W., a Child (in the Interest of K.M.W., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.