In the Interest of K.J.S., a Minor Child v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Interest of K.J.S., a Minor Child v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of K.J.S., a Minor Child v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 3, 2023
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00564-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF K.J.S., A MINOR CHILD
On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-19995
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Reichek, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Miskel Appellant Father filed a petition for divorce and appellee Mother filed a
counter-petition seeking a declaratory judgment that the parties did not have a
common law marriage. The parties sought conservatorship and child support for
their child in their respective petitions. Appellant appeals from the trial court’s
declaratory judgment finding that no marriage existed between the parties. Because
the trial court’s judgment left pending the issues of conservatorship and support for
the parties’ child, we questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal. We directed
appellant to file, by July 21, 2023 a letter brief addressing the Court’s concern and cautioned him that failure to do so may result in dismissal of the appeal without
further notice. To date, appellant has not responded.
Generally, this Court has jurisdiction over final judgments and certain
interlocutory orders as permitted by statute. See Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39
S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)
(listing appealable interlocutory orders). A final judgment is one that disposes of all
parties and claims. See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195.
Because the judgment does not resolve the claims regarding conservatorship
and support for the parties’ child and those claims remain pending, we dismiss the
appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
230564f.p05 /Emily Miskel/ EMILY MISKEL JUSTICE
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF K.J.S., A On Appeal from the 254th Judicial MINOR CHILD District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-19995. No. 05-23-00564-CV Opinion delivered by Justice Miskel. Justices Partida-Kipness and Reichek participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee Ayesha Rashetta Langrum recover her costs of this appeal from appellant William Blaine Sanders.
Judgment entered this 3rd day of August, 2023.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of K.J.S., a Minor Child v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-kjs-a-minor-child-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.