In the Interest of K.G. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of K.G. v. State

556 So. 2d 779, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 750, 1990 WL 10885

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1953

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 556 So. 2d 779 (In the Interest of K.G. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of K.G. v. State, 556 So. 2d 779, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 750, 1990 WL 10885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a student, appeals an order of disposition finding him guilty of battery upon a school bus driver in violation of section 231.06, Florida Statutes (1987).¹ Relying on Walker v. State, 501 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), appellant contends (in part) that this statute is intended to protect school employees against physical attacks primarily from outsiders, and that the facts in this case are not within the legislative intent described in Walker, Appellant has overlooked the fact that the Walker decision interpreted the 1985 version of section 231.06. Section 231.06 was amended in 1986. Chapter 86-210, § 2, Laws of Florida. The statute interpreted in Walker provided that “Whenever any parent or other person not subject to the discipline of the school commits an assault or battery ...” (emphasis supplied). The dicta in Walker obviously has no application to the changed language of section 231.06.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a student, appeals an order of disposition finding him guilty of battery upon a school bus driver in violation of section 231.06, Florida Statutes (1987).¹ Relying on Walker v. State, 501 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), appellant contends (in part) that this statute is intended to protect school employees against physical attacks primarily from outsiders, and that the facts in this case are not within the legislative intent described in Walker, Appellant has overlooked the fact that the Walker decision interpreted the 1985 version of section 231.06. Section 231.06 was amended in 1986. Chapter 86-210, § 2, Laws of Florida. The statute interpreted in Walker provided that “Whenever any parent or other person not subject to the discipline of the school commits an assault or battery ...” (emphasis supplied). The dicta in Walker obviously has no application to the changed language of section 231.06.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 So. 2d 779, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 750, 1990 WL 10885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-kg-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack