in the Interest of K.D.H., a Child
Opinion
|
|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-10-042-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF K.D.H., A CHILD
------------
FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
On April 15, 2010, we notified Appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. No response having been received, on May 11, 2010, we abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether Appellant desires to continue this appeal and appoint new appellate counsel if necessary. On June 14, 2010, we received a supplemental clerk=s record, and on June 15, 2010, we received the reporter=s record from the abatement hearing conducted pursuant to our May 11, 2010 abatement order. The supplemental clerk=s record and the reporter=s record confirm that Appellant has decided not to further pursue this appeal.
Because Appellant=s brief has not been filed and the appellate record confirms that Appellant has decided not to further pursue this appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: June 24, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of K.D.H., a Child (in the Interest of K.D.H., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.